ANCIENT? you said ISLAMIC LAW is ANCIENT? primitive? barbaric?
ISLAMIC LAW is DEVELOPED AND ESTABLISHED WELL BEFORE THE SO-CALLED WESTERN CIVILIZATION .
ISLAMIC LAW was REPLACED by the EUROPEAN [Christian] colonists against the will of the Islamic natives.
IF ISLAMIC LAW is implemented, lawyers who make MONEY WELL by manipulating the judicial system, will STAND TO LOSE [takleh cari makan]
that is why LAWYERS like KARPAL SINGH are so against ISLAMIC LAW. THEIR LIVELIHOOD depend on manipulating the civil law
DALAM KES PEMBUNUHAN SOSILAWATI, peguam KARPAL SINGH yang CARI MAKAN dengan menjadi PEGUAMBELA si tertuduh
KALAU HUKUM ISLAM BERJALAN, PEMBUNUH SOSILAWATI MESTI DIBICARAKAN DAN DIHUKUM IKUT UNDANG2 HUDUD/QISAS, SISTEM ISLAM. Karpal Singh tak boleh manipulate dan cari makan
BERAPA RAMAI PEGUAM [so called Law practitioners] yang REJECT ISLAMIC LAW
sebab depa takut tak boleh CARI MAKAN .... takboleh manipulasi // menipu sistem undang2
KALAU HANG TU KAFIR, JANGAN LA SEBOK NAK MENENTANG UNDANG2 ISLAM
UNDANG2 ISLAM MEMBAWA KEBAIKAN KEPADA ORANG ISLAM SENDIRI, faham?
KALAU HANG TU MENGAKU ISLAM, JANGAN LA SEBOK NAK MENENTANG UNDANG2 ISLAM
JANGAN LA JADI ORANG YANG MUNAFIQIN YANG DIBENCI ALLAH SWT [masuk neraka bawah sekali]
No comments:
Post a Comment